Nov 22, 2016
About 50 students, faculty, and staff, joined by the curator and artist, gathered for a lively discussion in the gallery on Monday. This conversation was emotional for everyone. By the end of the discussion, it was announced to the room that the exhibit would be temporarily suspended. Immediately, plans were made for concerned students who attended the forum to sit down with the Art + Design department on Monday (Nov. 28) and discuss next steps.
The concerns raised by students created an immediate dialogue on campus that is ongoing, and students are crucial to the discussion on what will happen next. Below is a timeline of events, and a message that was sent to students, faculty and staff today (Nov. 22).
- Wednesday, November 16: Salem State learns of students鈥 objections to the exhibit.
- Friday, Nov. 18: Students, faculty and staff were invited to a conversation the following Monday with the curator to discuss their concerns and hear from him as to his intent with the exhibit. (As was later arranged, the artist attended the forum as well).
- Monday, Nov. 21: A lively conversation is held with about 50 students, faculty, staff, the curator, and the artist. At the close of this meeting, the chair of Art + Design and the curator announced their decision to temporarily close the exhibit. Immediately, plans were made for concerned students who attended the forum to sit down with the Art + Design department on Monday (Nov. 28) and discuss next steps.
- Tuesday, Nov. 22: The chair of Art + Design and the curator sent the following message to students, faculty and staff:
Email to Salem State Students, Faculty and Staff Members (Nov. 22)
Dear Salem State Community,
Yesterday, we held a discussion on campus surrounding the 鈥淪tate of the Union鈥 exhibit in our Winfisky Gallery. This discussion was arranged due to strong negative reactions students had to items in this exhibit. The forum included students, faculty, staff, the exhibit鈥檚 curator, and the artist who created two of the controversial pieces of visual art.
We would like to apologize to those in the campus community who have experienced distress resulting from this exhibit. We are sorry. Yesterday鈥檚 conversation made clear the strong emotions this exhibit has caused. The artist offered his intent in creating the piece and participated in discussion with the students, as did faculty and administrators. At the end of the discussion, we announced that the two of us 鈥 the chair of the art + design department and the exhibit鈥檚 curator 鈥 have decided to temporarily suspend the exhibit and work with students to discuss next steps. Immediately following the meeting, we arranged a Monday meeting with students to discuss how to move forward while taking all concerns into consideration.
We understand that not displaying the context in close proximity to the artwork in the exhibit contributed to the strong reaction from our community. It is our usual practice to provide a 鈥済uest book鈥 in the gallery which contains information about the artists鈥 intent of their work. This is centrally located for visitors to read, either before or after they have viewed the art. Many of our visitors were not aware that this resource was available to them and therefore did not have the advantage of the context of each piece. When concerns began to be raised, we posted the artists鈥 intent statements adjacent to the art so the information was immediately available. Further, we covered the glass doors of the gallery and posted a warning that the exhibit contained art that may be upsetting to some viewers.
Art is often intended to spark discussion about societal ills. In this case, it did just that, but we deeply regret the distress it has caused students. We thank the students for sharing their views, and we look forward to working with them to determine how to move forward.
Sincerely,
Mary Melilli, Chair
Art + Design
Ken Reker, Curator
Winfisky Gallery